View Poll Results: A poll
SPAM-Jumpers... IDK...
0
0%
SPAM-Jumpers... NO!!! Not AGAIN!!!
0
0%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll
The Return of SPAM-Jumpers?!?!?
#22
06-15-2007, 06:41 PM
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lotsa places, currently Metro D.C., USA
Posts: 13,574
RE: The Return of SPAM-Jumpers?!?!?
No need to post the threads back here. Between me & rule #5, I think Ill be able to find 'em all. I think we only had 1 or 2 minor issues with uncounted SPAM, last time, but rule #5 should take care of that.
I needed another east-coaster, for balance, and your name popped into my head. The ERC is only around to overrule ME, in case I start acting biased, or mean (I'm never mean, except when I'm mean), or sunthin... It'll be the easiest money you'll never make, you'll see
ORIGINAL: BaconBait
Wait a sec...
How did I end up on the Executive Referee Committeee?
I vote we take a vote of something!
Wait a sec...
How did I end up on the Executive Referee Committeee?
I vote we take a vote of something!
#25
06-16-2007, 12:57 AM
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lotsa places, currently Metro D.C., USA
Posts: 13,574
RE: The Return of SPAM-Jumpers?!?!?
ORIGINAL: BaconBait
Sweet. But everyone knows I only work for peanut butter.
edit- Oh yeah, how about a 2 point penalty for false spam calling?
Sweet. But everyone knows I only work for peanut butter.
edit- Oh yeah, how about a 2 point penalty for false spam calling?
And, since the peanlty idea comes STRAIGHT from the ERC... SO BE IT!!!
ORIGINAL: 18T
first ill be ignored, then ill be penalized , then ill be banned somehow.
first ill be ignored, then ill be penalized , then ill be banned somehow.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post