Pictures
#1
Pictures
well I mean since Josh does it I should to right.
here are some pics of things I've taken over the last few months or so as I've been learning my camera. Constructive criticism is always welcome, as long as it makes sense.
Camera used was mostly my Nikon D60 with 18-55 Kit glass, but there are also some in there with my Casio exilim P&S
1.
2.
3.
4. One of the coolest old guys I'll ever meet, I have so much respect for him.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17/
18.
19.
20.
and to Josh or those who care, it's a mixture of cheating using Auto and using the P setting which is what I solely shoot on now unless I really don't feel like playing with my camera
here are some pics of things I've taken over the last few months or so as I've been learning my camera. Constructive criticism is always welcome, as long as it makes sense.
Camera used was mostly my Nikon D60 with 18-55 Kit glass, but there are also some in there with my Casio exilim P&S
1.
2.
3.
4. One of the coolest old guys I'll ever meet, I have so much respect for him.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17/
18.
19.
20.
and to Josh or those who care, it's a mixture of cheating using Auto and using the P setting which is what I solely shoot on now unless I really don't feel like playing with my camera
#3
Not to bad. My favorites are 11, 12, and 14.
Number 11 would be even better if it was centered up just a little bit more but it still looks really cool. I wish i lived in a big city so i could take pictures of buildings.
Also, try shooting on full manual. Thats more fun.
Good job though! Keep up the good work!
josh
Number 11 would be even better if it was centered up just a little bit more but it still looks really cool. I wish i lived in a big city so i could take pictures of buildings.
Also, try shooting on full manual. Thats more fun.
Good job though! Keep up the good work!
josh
#4
there all good!
i kind of like to know in some of the pics, what your intention was.
like #2 for example:
at first glance it seems out of balance, then when you study it a little more you can see that the line in the pavement seems to cut the picture in half, with the top portion being the main subject and the bottom half being the non subject, but it still contributes to the "whole" of the pic because it's necessary for it to balance.
does that make sense?
was that your objective?
sometimes i think when you explain what you're doing, it educates people on how to look at art in different ways other than the obvious.
i kind of like to know in some of the pics, what your intention was.
like #2 for example:
at first glance it seems out of balance, then when you study it a little more you can see that the line in the pavement seems to cut the picture in half, with the top portion being the main subject and the bottom half being the non subject, but it still contributes to the "whole" of the pic because it's necessary for it to balance.
does that make sense?
was that your objective?
sometimes i think when you explain what you're doing, it educates people on how to look at art in different ways other than the obvious.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audi_Skydiver
Off Topic
24
01-30-2008 01:11 PM