no marijuana link to lung cancer
#21
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
They will still come up with crazy fake reasons why smoking pot is so bad for you. I think the whole thing is crazy. We live in a free country, yet smoking a plant that grows naturally from the ground that we live on is illegal but smoking a stick of tobacco laced with chemicals that kills millions of people every year is ok. This country makes me really angry sometimes.
#23
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
Pot needs a better lobby in Washington. It's hard to make progress when your lobbyists get distracted by butterflies and end up buying the biggest bag of Cheetos they can find - and before long all of the congressmen have gone home for the night to throw down some drinks and bang their interns.
#24
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
ORIGINAL: avant80@2.6
empires fail?? we are talking genetics, are you drinking lol if so enjoy and have one for me
empires fail?? we are talking genetics, are you drinking lol if so enjoy and have one for me
#25
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
ORIGINAL: cary12
They will still come up with crazy fake reasons why smoking pot is so bad for you. I think the whole thing is crazy. We live in a free country, yet smoking a plant that grows naturally from the ground that we live on is illegal but smoking a stick of tobacco laced with chemicals that kills millions of people every year is ok. This country makes me really angry sometimes.
They will still come up with crazy fake reasons why smoking pot is so bad for you. I think the whole thing is crazy. We live in a free country, yet smoking a plant that grows naturally from the ground that we live on is illegal but smoking a stick of tobacco laced with chemicals that kills millions of people every year is ok. This country makes me really angry sometimes.
the crazy reason is that the drug lord are opposed to the taxing of there ****. why don't they get all the money, and the gov. want ther six of the seven dollors.
#26
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
ORIGINAL: flyboy
the crazy reason is that the drug lord are opposed to the taxing of there ****. why don't they get all the money, and the gov. want ther six of the seven dollors.
ORIGINAL: cary12
They will still come up with crazy fake reasons why smoking pot is so bad for you. I think the whole thing is crazy. We live in a free country, yet smoking a plant that grows naturally from the ground that we live on is illegal but smoking a stick of tobacco laced with chemicals that kills millions of people every year is ok. This country makes me really angry sometimes.
They will still come up with crazy fake reasons why smoking pot is so bad for you. I think the whole thing is crazy. We live in a free country, yet smoking a plant that grows naturally from the ground that we live on is illegal but smoking a stick of tobacco laced with chemicals that kills millions of people every year is ok. This country makes me really angry sometimes.
the crazy reason is that the drug lord are opposed to the taxing of there ****. why don't they get all the money, and the gov. want ther six of the seven dollors.
That is totally the reason. It's a total joke.
#27
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
Do u think that other cities are going to follow what denver has done. Decriminalize marijuana possesion? I personally think they should. If it was gvt regualted it could have alot of benefits for the economy. U could tax it pretty could. Its not addictive, and ppl will smoke that less then they would normal cigs. OO well those "laws" arent going to stop me.
#29
RE: no marijuana link to lung cancer
ORIGINAL: apg96
Do u think that other cities are going to follow what denver has done. Decriminalize marijuana possesion? I personally think they should. If it was gvt regualted it could have alot of benefits for the economy. U could tax it pretty could. Its not addictive, and ppl will smoke that less then they would normal cigs. OO well those "laws" arent going to stop me.
Do u think that other cities are going to follow what denver has done. Decriminalize marijuana possesion? I personally think they should. If it was gvt regualted it could have alot of benefits for the economy. U could tax it pretty could. Its not addictive, and ppl will smoke that less then they would normal cigs. OO well those "laws" arent going to stop me.
and about the addicting part...it may not be physically addicting like tobacco, caffeine, or other drugs, but it's definitely VERY mentally addicting.