My first R32 experience
#13
RE: My first R32 experience
ORIGINAL: midohioguy
i actually just read that the 3.2 A3 with s line is no faster than the 2.0t due to the extra weight from the larger engine.
i actually just read that the 3.2 A3 with s line is no faster than the 2.0t due to the extra weight from the larger engine.
#14
RE: My first R32 experience
tell that to road and truck dude.
from the oct. 06 version on page 117 "As nice as Audi's 250 hp v6 is, the added weight of the quattro, the larger engine and the options (3720 lb for the 3.2 v. 3350 for the front drive 2.0t) translate to a 1/4 mile of 15 seconds that is a tenth slower than the 2.0t."
got the facts to back it up.
from the oct. 06 version on page 117 "As nice as Audi's 250 hp v6 is, the added weight of the quattro, the larger engine and the options (3720 lb for the 3.2 v. 3350 for the front drive 2.0t) translate to a 1/4 mile of 15 seconds that is a tenth slower than the 2.0t."
got the facts to back it up.
#16
RE: My first R32 experience
ORIGINAL: flyboy
Yeah and I am at the controles of something hella faster and more powerful than any of those.
Yeah and I am at the controles of something hella faster and more powerful than any of those.
looooooooooooooooool . cheers!
but yea whatever guys, ive driven ladas beat that.
#17
RE: My first R32 experience
ORIGINAL: midohioguy
tell that to road and truck dude.
from the oct. 06 version on page 117 "As nice as Audi's 250 hp v6 is, the added weight of the quattro, the larger engine and the options (3720 lb for the 3.2 v. 3350 for the front drive 2.0t) translate to a 1/4 mile of 15 seconds that is a tenth slower than the 2.0t."
got the facts to back it up.
tell that to road and truck dude.
from the oct. 06 version on page 117 "As nice as Audi's 250 hp v6 is, the added weight of the quattro, the larger engine and the options (3720 lb for the 3.2 v. 3350 for the front drive 2.0t) translate to a 1/4 mile of 15 seconds that is a tenth slower than the 2.0t."
got the facts to back it up.
#18
RE: My first R32 experience
that's right. feels good to have the facts to back it up. i think i'd take the 2.0t regardless, just more fun to drive than the 3.2. same thing with the 2.0t a4 over the 3.0. the turbo is where it is at.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post