B5 Models Please discuss all 1996 - 2001 B5 A4 topics here...

Went from confused to baffled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:46 AM
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,150
Default Went from confused to baffled

So me and Evo Boy split the deposit of a built 87 GT Fox. We got it down to $4200 and all seemed good.
Details on the car:
1987 Mustang GT
carburated 302 Motor just built less than 1,000 miles
100 shot nitrous kit w/ purge and bottle warmer
edlebrock performer intake
Holley 650 DP carb
AFR 165 heads w/ 1.6 roller rockers
ARP head studs and Main Girdle
AFM N41 cams
BBK headers toH pipe to flowmasters dumped before rear axle
8.8 rear with moser 33's and 4:10 gears, c-clip eliminator and rear diff girdle
26x12.5x15 Mickey Thompson ET's on Weld 5 star rims
MSD ignition
Holley Blue pump with sumped tank
Battery relocated to trunk w/ On & Off switch
Battle boxes and Subframe Connectors (welded in)
Solid Motor Mounts, No AC or Power Steering
Liberty Gears Pro-Shifted T5 trans w/ 5th gear removed for track (New just built less than 100 miles on it)
Line lock and 2-step
Aluminum radiator with electric fan
Bumper removal kit for weight reduction
Car is blue with black interior, have an extra set of door panels and a brand new pair of slicks (26x10.5).

So we went and looked at it tonight, it was pretty clean for an 87, and definitely track ready, just needs a cage. Def a low 12's or high 11's car on motor and well into the 10's on bottle. BUT, we got home and found the same year car with a nice build and already turbo'd making 437rwhp and 607rwtq. No slicks, needs a cage and a decent amount of supporting mods to really run the car right. Only $1000 more, but not a complete turbo build. We have until 10am to decide and either get some of our deposit back and go with the turbo, or just stick with the track bottle car.
Advice/suggestions please.
 
  #2  
Old 09-01-2010, 01:59 AM
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,150
Default

Im "evo boy", used to be a member of this site before I grew up and realized Evo's are the way to go and Audi's are just cute lol.
The one we put the deposit on, seems to be done right and looks to be the better choice right now. It was definitely a thought out build and much more track ready. The turbo car sounds very "pieced together" just to be a "turbo stang". It seems like we will have to dump the same amount of money into either one to be setup for the goal we want, but the turbo one seems like more of a timebomb and needs some fixing and building to run optimal. The point we are at now, is do we want to spend the time and money to get an already built car to a higher potential, or redo a car that has been built somewhat foolishly and takeon someone elses headache. Keep in mind that these cars are extremely cheap and easy to build, but you guys can see our dilemma.
I know this is the most backwards forum to ask these questions, but we could use a lil insight. All motor with a lil spray vs turbo 5.0?????
BTW the turbo is off a 7.3L F-350 diesel.
 
  #3  
Old 09-01-2010, 07:41 AM
ObnoxiousDrunk's Avatar
3rd Gear
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,636
Default

I'd go with what looks to be set-up better and has the most potential. Especially if the build quality of the "turbo stang" is questionable. Sounds like both cars are pretty mean.
 
  #4  
Old 09-01-2010, 09:45 AM
ImTheDevil's Avatar
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 11,670
Default

A boosted 5.0, especially turbo, is a wicked car. I agree with Erik though - if it's questionable, stick with the sprayed car. You said the turbo car needs a decent amount of investment still to fully realize what it can do. That's based on inspecting the car. It may turn out that corners were cut and that investment would then grow. Could happen on either car but the nitrous car has a thorough list of proper work to support its setup. I'd go that route.
 
  #5  
Old 09-01-2010, 11:42 AM
Mike-2ptzero's Avatar
4th Gear
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Phoenix, Arizona area
Posts: 3,274
Default

Well you could always put a turbo on the bottle car.

You only need a roll bar if you plan on running 10's and lower then 135 mph traps. Dont need a roll cage till 135+ or running 9.9's and the cage will have to be NHRA certified. Plus to run 135+ mph you will also need to get a NHRA Lic. Also make sure the car has a oil catch pan under the motor and a driveshaft loop.
 
  #6  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:14 PM
hiwords's Avatar
5th Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: noob from NY
Posts: 7,728
Default

this guy has multiple personalities lol. i'd go with the non turboed. so which one did you go with?
 
  #7  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:23 PM
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,150
Default

So we picked up the bottle car, pretty happy with it so far. The turbod one turned out to be even crappier done than we originally thought. Time to rip in to her and get it perfect. heres a pic.
Name:  7b87b0bf.jpg
Views: 64
Size:  191.4 KB
 
  #8  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:26 PM
FASTER's Avatar
Tech Slut
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,150
Default

Originally Posted by Mike-2ptzero
Well you could always put a turbo on the bottle car.

You only need a roll bar if you plan on running 10's and lower then 135 mph traps. Dont need a roll cage till 135+ or running 9.9's and the cage will have to be NHRA certified. Plus to run 135+ mph you will also need to get a NHRA Lic. Also make sure the car has a oil catch pan under the motor and a driveshaft loop.
The diff is looped but no catchpan yet.
 
  #9  
Old 09-01-2010, 12:59 PM
hiwords's Avatar
5th Gear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: noob from NY
Posts: 7,728
Default

very noice. now let's see some videos of this thing in action
 
  #10  
Old 09-01-2010, 04:57 PM
jjcrt2's Avatar
1st Gear
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EPHRATA PENNSYLVANIA
Posts: 267
Default

i would sell my car for that and drive a beater that thing looks ****!
 


Quick Reply: Went from confused to baffled



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 AM.