What will yield more power?
#6
RE: What will yield more power?
Good point...
DP is on the upper limits of DIY which means you'll probably be paying a shop $$$ to install it.
On the other hang Exhaust is a pretty simple DIY which means No install costs.
DP is on the upper limits of DIY which means you'll probably be paying a shop $$$ to install it.
On the other hang Exhaust is a pretty simple DIY which means No install costs.
#10
RE: What will yield more power?
ORIGINAL: WishIWasRWD
Agreed...
but exhaust makes you sound faster
and there won't be a huge hp difference either way.
ORIGINAL: cincyTT
chip + dp
chip + dp
but exhaust makes you sound faster
and there won't be a huge hp difference either way.
Intake and catback:
"The TT was finally strapped down and a couple low speed test runs were done to make sure that everything was setup correctly. After dialing in the dyno, we began the first of three runs for the day. It should be noted that conditions were almost identical to the first time we dyno’d Project TT, with the outside air temperature being only slightly warmer. As with most dyno’s, the first run usually yields the best numbers and ours was no exception, putting down just under 205 whp at 4,750 rpms and 238 ft. lbs of torque at 3,000 rpms. This was an increase of almost 8 whp and 22 ft. lbs. of torque over our previous best runs. The next two runs netted 201 whp and 231 ft. lbs. of torque, so some heat soak was apparent after the initial run. Horsepower and torque increases began at 2,400 rpms and continued until 5,200 rpms over our baseline chipped run. Another interesting tidbit was that max power occurred at 4,750 rpms on this dyno, compared to 5,750 rpms on our first dyno."
After adding DP:
"After strapping Project TT down, a number of runs were made, producing impressive results. The best run of the day netted a 9.3 hp and 19.3 ft. lb. peak gain at the wheels. Not only did it yield these peak gains, but power was increased over the entire RPM range. Torque and horsepower was now being made much sooner in the rpm range. The car is now making about 125 ft. lbs. of torque at 1,900 rpms, as opposed to 2,400 RPMs before the downpipe install. Peak horsepower was also occurring at 5,500 RPMs, rather than 6,250 RPMs as previously recorded. Upper range power was also markedly better, with an approximate 15 wheel horsepower gain at 5800 RPMs over the previous run."