Tcarbon FMIC vs Forge Motorsport FMIC 180 HP Quattro
#91
RE: Tcarbon FMIC vs Forge Motorsport FMIC 180 HP Quattro
nice pics! i personally preffer silicon hosing over shinny aluminum. but thats just me. still a clean setup, but the FMIC still look a little smaller tell you the truth.
#93
RE: Tcarbon FMIC vs Forge Motorsport FMIC 180 HP Quattro
Core length : 24"
Core height : 9"
Core thickness : 2 3/4"
Inlet/Outlet size : 2 3/4"
There was no welding. He just got a long peice of aluminum and cut it into 3 strips and 6 bolts to support the core.
Here is his new thread
Core height : 9"
Core thickness : 2 3/4"
Inlet/Outlet size : 2 3/4"
There was no welding. He just got a long peice of aluminum and cut it into 3 strips and 6 bolts to support the core.
Here is his new thread
#98
RE: Tcarbon FMIC vs Forge Motorsport FMIC 180 HP Quattro
the silicone pipes are more heat resistant, and the proper silicone hoses have re-inforcements which prevent flexing. tey are actually quite stiff and hold up a lot more pressure than one thinks.
(they are not as soft as the wifes ***** [sm=happy046.gif])
(they are not as soft as the wifes ***** [sm=happy046.gif])
#99
RE: Tcarbon FMIC vs Forge Motorsport FMIC 180 HP Quattro
The aluminum can also transfer heat better than silicon. It can draw out some of the heat in the charge pipe.....unfortuatly, it can absorb heat from the engine aswell.
#100
RE: Tcarbon FMIC vs Forge Motorsport FMIC 180 HP Quattro
win some u lose some ... its up to personal prefference.
im gonna grab the tcarbon setup when i come back from vacation, should be a good setup. ill make sure i get lots of pick
im gonna grab the tcarbon setup when i come back from vacation, should be a good setup. ill make sure i get lots of pick