MK2 TT's Suck.
#1
10-16-2007 | 11:42 AM
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,637
From: NEPA / NYC
MK2 TT's Suck.
The New TT's Suck.
Ok, now that I have your attention:
I like the new style and I think it is a worthwhile car if you aren't a real driver. Everything on the market kicks it's *** right now I think audi took a step in the right direction with most of the updates on the new TT, but the whole industry has been making leaps instead.
How is audi competing with the rest of the market?
You new model owners... What the hell were you thinking?
There are so many other cars that do everything that the TT does, and better for less $
How is audi able to float the TT?
Example of a product in their own line:
I was at the dealer last week
Sticker on a 3.2 TTis $45k.
The S5 Sticker is around $50k.
Why would anyone think twice about the TT?
I know they are different cars, but to me it's a no-brainer.
Ok, now that I have your attention:
I like the new style and I think it is a worthwhile car if you aren't a real driver. Everything on the market kicks it's *** right now I think audi took a step in the right direction with most of the updates on the new TT, but the whole industry has been making leaps instead.
How is audi competing with the rest of the market?
You new model owners... What the hell were you thinking?
There are so many other cars that do everything that the TT does, and better for less $
How is audi able to float the TT?
Example of a product in their own line:
I was at the dealer last week
Sticker on a 3.2 TTis $45k.
The S5 Sticker is around $50k.
Why would anyone think twice about the TT?
I know they are different cars, but to me it's a no-brainer.
#6
10-16-2007 | 12:23 PM
SoCal Crew Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,819
From: L.A.
RE: MK2 TT's Suck.
ORIGINAL: 225tt
New TT.....45K
Lotus ELISE.....45K
Lotus EXIGE S.....57K
Ok so the last one dosent even compare but I see where you are going in this direction.
New TT.....45K
Lotus ELISE.....45K
Lotus EXIGE S.....57K
Ok so the last one dosent even compare but I see where you are going in this direction.
#8
10-16-2007 | 12:40 PM
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,637
From: NEPA / NYC
RE: MK2 TT's Suck.
S5
Elise
M coupe / roadster
Cayman / Boxster
Corvette
****... the 500hp Shelby GT500 Mustang is only $45k
s2000, EVO, and 350zare 10k less
Saturn Sky redline, solstice GXP...
Not as classy, but their performance kills the TT.
Elise
M coupe / roadster
Cayman / Boxster
Corvette
****... the 500hp Shelby GT500 Mustang is only $45k
s2000, EVO, and 350zare 10k less
Saturn Sky redline, solstice GXP...
Not as classy, but their performance kills the TT.
#9
10-16-2007 | 12:43 PM
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,637
From: NEPA / NYC
RE: MK2 TT's Suck.
ORIGINAL: ouTTie914
Saw a new S5 at the dealer today. It's pretty sharp looking in person.
Saw a new S5 at the dealer today. It's pretty sharp looking in person.
That's what started this thread...
Plus, I had a loaner 2007 A4 over the weekend. I didn't want to give it back.
A coupe version with almost double the HP (S5) would be a very fun car.
Why were you there???
#10
10-16-2007 | 01:03 PM
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
RE: MK2 TT's Suck.
You just have to think of the tuning potential. You buy a BMW whatever and your pretty much stuck to basic boltons and same goes for the others unless you drop tons more for forced induction (new 1series excluded for now). When/if the TT comes in a 2.0T and awd it will match if not pass the others in performance, comfort, style, and so on. Id still rather pull up in a MKI than and the others listed.... well maybe a Lotus as a fun car.