2.0L or 3.2L?
#13
10-06-2008 | 09:23 PM
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,198
From:
Oddly enough I wasn't talking about the TTS...Audi offers the 200hp 2.0T with quattro now (they didn't offer that forever! only reason I know is I took a peek the other day at their site). Still has that lameo S-tronic though.
#14
10-06-2008 | 10:26 PM
2nd Gear
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 656
From:
I think what the TTS shows us is that you dont have to think HP to get good speed. Its only 265 HP but does 0 60 in 5.2 stock. So I wouldnt necessarily think you need 300 HP to make good times like other heavier cars. I dont know what else they have done to get that speed like maybe compression ratio or what but they made a fast car thats under 300 HP. Chip it and you are probably at 300 and then really fast.
#15
10-06-2008 | 10:54 PM
1st Gear
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 10
stay with the vr6, youll need to upgrade the turbo to a k04 on the 2.0 to get over 300 whp reliably. the vr6 is is a better engine hands down. if you need a turbo kit we offer our custom kit starting at 8k. you would make 360 whp minimal with this kit. head gasket option puts you over 400 whp.
#17
10-07-2008 | 12:40 PM
I'm make believe
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,587
From: In my head
#18
10-07-2008 | 01:29 PM
1st Gear
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 220
Last edited by l88m22vette; 10-09-2008 at 12:03 PM.
