the real question 1.8 - 2.8
#52
RE: the real question 1.8 - 2.8
this is ture but i know for a fact that at least one of the 30v drivers was a better driver than me and would have kicked my *** if he could but he just didnt have the power
ORIGINAL: AudiCross
badd luckkkkk, he stated that it has a lot to do with a drive. i have watched a 13 sec camaro run in the 15's because the dude couldnt launch or shift too well or at the right points
badd luckkkkk, he stated that it has a lot to do with a drive. i have watched a 13 sec camaro run in the 15's because the dude couldnt launch or shift too well or at the right points
#54
RE: the real question 1.8 - 2.8
'99.5 30v 2.8 Quattro Tip and I chose it over a '00 1.8T Quattro MT.
When I drove the 1.8T, it was dead in the bottom end and didn't pull like I expected it to.
When I drove the 2.8, I felt the back of my seat and I didn't have to wait for anything to spool.
I wanted something that was quick out of the box w/o needing mods, classy, reliable, fun to drive and AWD. The 2.8 Quattro fit the bill.
+1 on the V6 growl ... Interesting to see your fuel economy w/ the MT. I'm tip and I avg 12L/100km
When I drove the 1.8T, it was dead in the bottom end and didn't pull like I expected it to.
When I drove the 2.8, I felt the back of my seat and I didn't have to wait for anything to spool.
I wanted something that was quick out of the box w/o needing mods, classy, reliable, fun to drive and AWD. The 2.8 Quattro fit the bill.
ORIGINAL: Schlampah
I have a 2.8 mannual quattro and its great. Above 4500k rpm the engine has this muscley torquey growl - its fantastic.
only negative is that it guzzles gas under 'fast' but not insane city driving. I use just under 15L/ 100km !
You may as well get a 2.8 as well since it will probably have more options for pretty much the same price as a 1.8slow
I have a 2.8 mannual quattro and its great. Above 4500k rpm the engine has this muscley torquey growl - its fantastic.
only negative is that it guzzles gas under 'fast' but not insane city driving. I use just under 15L/ 100km !
You may as well get a 2.8 as well since it will probably have more options for pretty much the same price as a 1.8slow
#55
RE: the real question 1.8 - 2.8
ORIGINAL: LabattZ
'99.5 30v 2.8 Quattro Tip and I chose it over a '00 1.8T Quattro MT.
When I drove the 1.8T, it was dead in the bottom end and didn't pull like I expected it to.
When I drove the 2.8, I felt the back of my seat and I didn't have to wait for anything to spool.
I wanted something that was quick out of the box w/o needing mods, classy, reliable, fun to drive and AWD. The 2.8 Quattro fit the bill.
+1 on the V6 growl ... Interesting to see your fuel economy w/ the MT. I'm tip and I avg 12L/100km
'99.5 30v 2.8 Quattro Tip and I chose it over a '00 1.8T Quattro MT.
When I drove the 1.8T, it was dead in the bottom end and didn't pull like I expected it to.
When I drove the 2.8, I felt the back of my seat and I didn't have to wait for anything to spool.
I wanted something that was quick out of the box w/o needing mods, classy, reliable, fun to drive and AWD. The 2.8 Quattro fit the bill.
ORIGINAL: Schlampah
I have a 2.8 mannual quattro and its great. Above 4500k rpm the engine has this muscley torquey growl - its fantastic.
only negative is that it guzzles gas under 'fast' but not insane city driving. I use just under 15L/ 100km !
You may as well get a 2.8 as well since it will probably have more options for pretty much the same price as a 1.8slow
I have a 2.8 mannual quattro and its great. Above 4500k rpm the engine has this muscley torquey growl - its fantastic.
only negative is that it guzzles gas under 'fast' but not insane city driving. I use just under 15L/ 100km !
You may as well get a 2.8 as well since it will probably have more options for pretty much the same price as a 1.8slow
thats what the V6 is for.... to be quick out of the box.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post