A4 2.0t Quatro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
#63
06-29-2006, 02:29 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quatro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
ORIGINAL: TheJazz7
And the irony that I myself misspelled "gramatical" only underscores my point. We all write fast, nobody uses a spellchecker for this stuff. Don't be that guy at a party who lectures people that "irregardless" isn't a word, and "farther" relates to distance, while "further" relates to magnitude or degree, etc...certainly not while trying to make an argument for friendly, informed debate about the topic at hand.
And to the original poster...buy the Audi. Seriously, were you expecting a different answer from "AudiForums"?
And the irony that I myself misspelled "gramatical" only underscores my point. We all write fast, nobody uses a spellchecker for this stuff. Don't be that guy at a party who lectures people that "irregardless" isn't a word, and "farther" relates to distance, while "further" relates to magnitude or degree, etc...certainly not while trying to make an argument for friendly, informed debate about the topic at hand.
And to the original poster...buy the Audi. Seriously, were you expecting a different answer from "AudiForums"?
I didn't get past the misspelling of aesthetics, so I totally missed the other ones.
And that's not irony.
#65
06-29-2006, 02:32 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quattro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
ORIGINAL: avant80@2.6
Subaru is ford as is Saab
Subaru is ford as is Saab
Are you as clueless about everything as you are about cars? Did you not read the earlier posts?
GM owns about 25 percent of Subaru and all of Saab.
#66
06-29-2006, 02:33 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quatro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
ORIGINAL: ejc317
I don't thinkj anyone buys AUdi for the awd system ... if u wanted that **** buy a subaru
I don't thinkj anyone buys AUdi for the awd system ... if u wanted that **** buy a subaru
Sure, if it breaks you're screwed, but when it works, it's excellent.
#67
06-29-2006, 02:37 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quattro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
spelling hmmm is it that important when we understand the question??? we are a multi lingual society so they are not important (we are not at school) and this is no training area for the English language, I personally find it very interesting though spelling is at the back of my mind and considered no downfall to that person or where they come from
#68
06-29-2006, 02:45 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quatro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
I have never heard of a system completely breaking and leaving you stuck they might leak but a seal is a seal and it is not going to last for ever
#69
06-29-2006, 02:59 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quatro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
Here are some examples of that great SAAB styling.
Wow, what hot cars. I want want one now.....uh.....no.
[IMG]local://upfiles/12448/80817C80DB664C7486063DE884521B2F.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/12448/FF9359CB1E054E3CAC75C77B16AEB303.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/12448/16529E9299244ED3BB716BC76F58D88D.jpg[/IMG]
Wow, what hot cars. I want want one now.....uh.....no.
[IMG]local://upfiles/12448/80817C80DB664C7486063DE884521B2F.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/12448/FF9359CB1E054E3CAC75C77B16AEB303.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]local://upfiles/12448/16529E9299244ED3BB716BC76F58D88D.jpg[/IMG]
#70
06-29-2006, 03:08 PM
RE: A4 2.0t Quatro Vs. Saab 9-3 Aero
ORIGINAL: mike saunders
I didn't get past the misspelling of aesthetics, so I totally missed the other ones.
And that's not irony.
ORIGINAL: TheJazz7
And the irony that I myself misspelled "gramatical" only underscores my point. We all write fast, nobody uses a spellchecker for this stuff. Don't be that guy at a party who lectures people that "irregardless" isn't a word, and "farther" relates to distance, while "further" relates to magnitude or degree, etc...certainly not while trying to make an argument for friendly, informed debate about the topic at hand.
And to the original poster...buy the Audi. Seriously, were you expecting a different answer from "AudiForums"?
And the irony that I myself misspelled "gramatical" only underscores my point. We all write fast, nobody uses a spellchecker for this stuff. Don't be that guy at a party who lectures people that "irregardless" isn't a word, and "farther" relates to distance, while "further" relates to magnitude or degree, etc...certainly not while trying to make an argument for friendly, informed debate about the topic at hand.
And to the original poster...buy the Audi. Seriously, were you expecting a different answer from "AudiForums"?
I didn't get past the misspelling of aesthetics, so I totally missed the other ones.
And that's not irony.
I'm a professional communicator, I write for a living, so you wouldn't expect me to make spelling mistakes. You, on the other hand, appear to be a tool so I'm not surprised at all by your tool-ish remarks. See the difference?
By the way, "regardless" of your reply to this post, this will be my last comment regarding this issue....definitely NOT getting sucked into a debate this lame. Have a nice day.